Q1. According to the text, a history of English literature is fundamentally an account of what?
Q2. What does every book immediately take us back to, according to the text?
Q3. In a history of English literature, what must we fix attention upon?
Q4. What is a key limitation mentioned regarding a short sketch of literature history?
Q5. According to the text, what does 'genius' fundamentally mean?
Q6. Why is it important to understand the distinctive quality of an author's genius?
Q7. How does the text describe the initial, obvious answer to 'What is a history of English literature?'
Q8. What does every book embody, aside from being a product of genius?
Q9. In examining authors, what must be left for a more extended study?
Q10. What is the consequence of strength of personality in a writer?